Cesarean birth, obstetric emergencies, and adverse neonatal outcomes in Iceland during a period of increasing labor induction.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Gunnarsdóttir, JóhannaSwift, Emma M
Jakobsdóttir, Jóhanna
Smárason, Alexander
Thorkelsson, Thordur
Einarsdóttir, Kristjana
Issue Date
2021-06-16
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Gunnarsdóttir J, Swift EM, Jakobsdóttir J, Smárason A, Thorkelsson T, Einarsdóttir K. Cesarean birth, obstetric emergencies, and adverse neonatal outcomes in Iceland during a period of increasing labor induction. Birth. 2021 Jun 16. doi: 10.1111/birt.12564.Abstract
Background: The rate of labor induction has risen steeply throughout the world. This project aimed to estimate changes in the rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in Iceland between 1997 and 2018, and to assess whether the changes can be explained by an increased rate of labor induction. Methods: Singleton live births, occurring between 1997 and 2018, that did not start by prelabor cesarean, were identified from the Icelandic Medical Birth Register (n = 85 971). Rates of intrapartum cesarean birth (CB), obstetric emergencies, and neonatal outcomes were calculated, and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with log-binomial regression (reference: 1997-2001). Adjustments were made for: (a) maternal characteristics, and (b) labor induction and gestational age. Results: The rate of labor induction increased from 13.6% in the period 1997-2001 to 28.1% in the period 2014-2018. The rate of intrapartum CB decreased between the periods of 1997-2001 and 2014-2018 for both primiparous (aRR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.84) and multiparous women (aRR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.63). The rate of obstetric emergencies and adverse neonatal outcomes also decreased between these time periods. Adjusting for labor induction did not attenuate these associations. Conclusions: The rates of adverse maternal outcomes and adverse neonatal outcomes decreased over the study period. However, there was no evidence that this decrease could be explained by the increased rate of labor induction. Keywords: cesarean; labor induction; neonatal outcome; obstetric emergencies.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowAdditional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12564Rights
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/birt.12564
Scopus Count
Collections