Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Veronese, NicolaPetrovic, Mirko
Benetos, Athanase
Denkinger, Michael
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Knol, Wilma
Marking, Christine
Soulis, George
Maggi, Stefania
Cherubini, Antonio
Issue Date
2021-09-03
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Veronese N, Petrovic M, Benetos A, et al. Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;71:101455. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101455Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic older subjects have been disproportionately affected by the disease. Vaccination is a fundamental intervention to prevent the negative consequences of COVID-19, but it is not known if the needs and vulnerabilities of older people are adequately addressed by their inclusion in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of vaccines for COVID-19. Given this background, we aimed to evaluate if current and ongoing phase II-III RCTs evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines included a representative sample of older people. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed until May 01st, 2021. Among 474 abstracts initially retrieved, 20 RCTs (ten already published, ten ongoing) were included. In the ten studies already published, the mean age of participants was 45.2 ± 11.9 years and only 9.83% of the participants were more than 65 years, 1.66% more than 75 years and less than 1% (0.55%) more than 85 years. In the ten ongoing RCTs, many of the studies aimed at including participants older than 18 years, with one study including participants between 18 and 84 years, and two between 21 and 100 years. In conclusion, our systematic review demonstrates that in published and ongoing phase II-III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines only a tiny fraction of the most vulnerable group of older people was included, although they clearly were the first population that had to be vaccinated. Keywords: COVID-19; Older adults; Vaccination.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowAdditional Links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163721002026?via%3Dihubhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413602/
Rights
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.arr.2021.101455
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Authors: Sharif N, Alzahrani KJ, Ahmed SN, Dey SK
- Issue date: 2021
- Colchicine for the treatment of COVID-19.
- Authors: Mikolajewska A, Fischer AL, Piechotta V, Mueller A, Metzendorf MI, Becker M, Dorando E, Pacheco RL, Martimbianco ALC, Riera R, Skoetz N, Stegemann M
- Issue date: 2021 Oct 18
- Caution in underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines.
- Authors: Chen Y, Li Z, Gao Y, Tian J
- Issue date: 2021 Dec
- Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
- Authors: Singh B, Ryan H, Kredo T, Chaplin M, Fletcher T
- Issue date: 2021 Feb 12
- Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials.
- Authors: Yang S, Li Y, Dai L, Wang J, He P, Li C, Fang X, Wang C, Zhao X, Huang E, Wu C, Zhong Z, Wang F, Duan X, Tian S, Wu L, Liu Y, Luo Y, Chen Z, Li F, Li J, Yu X, Ren H, Liu L, Meng S, Yan J, Hu Z, Gao L, Gao GF
- Issue date: 2021 Aug