Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Guðnadóttir, Gyða KatrínJónasson, Gunnar
Clausen, Michael
Sørensen, Tonie Gertin
Kristjánsson, Sigurður
Issue Date
2021-12-08
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Guðnadóttir GK, Jónasson G, Clausen M, Sørensen TG, Kristjánsson S. Antibiotic oral provocation challenge in children [published online ahead of print, 2021 Dec 8]. Acta Paediatr. 2021;10.1111/apa.16211. doi:10.1111/apa.16211Abstract
Aim: The main objective of this study was to see how many of the children, with a suspected antibiotic allergy, developed an allergic or adverse reaction to a drug provocation test. Methods: Data on children that had undergone a drug provocation test for a suspected antibiotic allergy were compiled retrospectively for the period from 2007-2018. The median age at the first provocation was 2.25 years (1.5-5.7). Standardised questionnaires, the children's parents had answered before the provocation, were used to evaluate the originally suspected allergic reaction, previous health, atopic diseases and family history. Results: Ninety-two (6.4%) of the 1440 children showed a possible mild allergic reaction. Sixty-four of the 92 children underwent a second drug provocation test 1-2 years later. At that time, only eleven developed a positive- or a possible-delayed reaction. Conclusion: An immediate moderate or severe allergic reaction was excluded in all cases of suspected antibiotic allergy in this study. Our study indicates that an oral drug provocation test is safe. It may be appropriate to wait for 6 months or more after the initial event of ADR before these tests are performed. A second oral provocation 1-2 years after the first one shows that ADRs are outgrown in most children. Keywords: acute otitis media (AOM); adverse drug reactions (ADRs); oral provocation test.Description
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowAdditional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.16211Rights
© 2021 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/apa.16211
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Diagnostic evaluation and risk factors for drug allergies in children: from clinical history to skin and challenge tests.
- Authors: Arikoglu T, Aslan G, Batmaz SB, Eskandari G, Helvaci I, Kuyucu S
- Issue date: 2015 Aug
- Direct oral provocation tests in non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions related to beta-lactam antibiotics.
- Authors: Vezir E, Dibek Misirlioglu E, Civelek E, Capanoglu M, Guvenir H, Ginis T, Toyran M, Kocabas CN
- Issue date: 2016 Feb
- Oral challenge without skin tests in children with non-severe beta-lactam hypersensitivity: Time to change the paradigm?
- Authors: Moral L, Caubet JC
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Radiocontrast Media Hypersensitivity: Skin Testing Differentiates Allergy From Nonallergic Reactions and Identifies a Safe Alternative as Proven by Intravenous Provocation.
- Authors: Trautmann A, Brockow K, Behle V, Stoevesandt J
- Issue date: 2019 Sep - Oct
- Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in children.
- Authors: Ponvert C, Le Clainche L, de Blic J, Le Bourgeois M, Scheinmann P, Paupe J
- Issue date: 1999 Oct