Comparison of women's diet assessed by FFQs and 24-hour recalls with and without underreporters: associations with biomarkers
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorsOlafsdottir, Anna S
MetadataShow full item record
CitationAnn. Nutr. Metab. 2006, 50(5):450-60
AbstractBACKGROUND/AIMS: Women's diet can be especially difficult to assess, as women tend to underreport their intakes more often than men and are more likely to do so if they think they are overweight or obese. The aim was to compare two methods to assess women's diet and how well they associate with biomarkers. The influence and frequency of underreporting was also investigated. METHODS: Diet of 53 women was assessed by two 24-hour recalls and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Blood was analyzed for retinol, beta-carotene, vitamin C and serum ferritin, and 24-hour urine for nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Underreporting was evaluated with nitrogen excretion vs. intake, and energy intake vs. basal metabolic rate. RESULTS: Energy percent (E%) from macronutrients was similar from FFQ and 24-hour recalls, but total intake was higher from 24-hour recalls (9,516 +/- 2,080 vs. 8,183 +/- 2,893 kJ, p < 0.01). Intakes of vitamin C and potassium from both methods correlated with their respective biomarkers (r = 0.316-0.393). Underreporters had higher body mass index (BMI) than others (27.7 +/- 5.5 vs. 23.8 +/- 3.7 kg/m2, p < 0.05). They reported lower E% total fat (32 +/- 5 vs. 38 +/- 6 E%, p < 0.01) and higher E% carbohydrate (49 +/- 4 vs. 45 +/- 7 E%, p < 0.05). Correlation between intake and biomarkers increased after exclusion of underreporters. CONCLUSION: For women, FFQ and 24-hour recalls give similar E% and most nutrients correlate, but FFQ gives lower intake. Underreporters have higher BMI and diminish the correlation between calculated intake and biomarkers. This has to be considered when intake data are associated with weight management, disease and lifestyle factors.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. II. Relative validity and reproducibility for nutrients.
- Authors: Ocké MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Pols MA, Smit HA, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D
- Issue date: 1997
- Underreporting of energy intake in Brazilian women varies according to dietary assessment: a cross-sectional study using doubly labeled water.
- Authors: Scagliusi FB, Ferriolli E, Pfrimer K, Laureano C, Cunha CS, Gualano B, Lourenço BH, Lancha AH Jr
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- Validity and reliability of a new food frequency questionnaire compared to 24 h recalls and biochemical measurements: pilot phase of Golestan cohort study of esophageal cancer.
- Authors: Malekshah AF, Kimiagar M, Saadatian-Elahi M, Pourshams A, Nouraie M, Goglani G, Hoshiarrad A, Sadatsafavi M, Golestan B, Yoonesi A, Rakhshani N, Fahimi S, Nasrollahzadeh D, Salahi R, Ghafarpour A, Semnani S, Steghens JP, Abnet CC, Kamangar F, Dawsey SM, Brennan P, Boffetta P, Malekzadeh R
- Issue date: 2006 Aug
- Dietary assessment instruments for preschool children: reliability of parental responses to the 24-hour recall and a food frequency questionnaire.
- Authors: Treiber FA, Leonard SB, Frank G, Musante L, Davis H, Strong WB, Levy M
- Issue date: 1990 Jun
- Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for the Canadian Study of Diet, Lifestyle and Health cohort.
- Authors: Jain MG, Rohan TE, Soskolne CL, Kreiger N
- Issue date: 2003 Feb