Increasing sex difference in bone strength in old age: The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES-REYKJAVIK)
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Harris, Tamara B
Lang, Thomas F
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBone 2006, 39(3):644-51
AbstractINTRODUCTION: It is important to identify possible pathological mechanisms that underlie the known sexual dimorphism in bone fragility in old age. In this cross-sectional population-based study, we use data from three different skeletal sites to examine sex differences in volumetric bone density, geometry and strength indices and determine whether sex differences in these bone strength measures continue to increase into very old age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1715 elderly individuals (807 men and 908 women) age 67-93 years, participants in a population-based study, the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study (AGES-REYKJAVIK) and not taking medications affecting bone metabolism, were studied. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was performed in the lumbar spine, hip and mid-femoral shaft to estimate volumetric trabecular, cortical and integral BMD, bone geometry and bone strength indices. Regression models were used to assess the effects of age and gender-adjustment for standing midlife height and current weight. RESULTS: At age 67-69 years, men had 24.9-31.7% larger cross-sectional bone size at measured sites than women. At all bone sites, women had two- to fivefold diminution in net bone mass with age compared to men but had comparable increments in bone size (1.8-6.0% per 10 years). This was reflected in significantly worse (more than twofold) bone strength measures with age in women, including compressive strength indices at the spine, femoral neck and trochanter and bending strength indices at the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: With the limitations of a cross-sectional study, our data support the hypothesis that sex differences in bone strength continue into old age. These sex differences appear to be due to greater net bone loss in women rather than due to greater bone gain in men.
DescriptionTo access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging.
- Authors: Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang XF, Seeman E
- Issue date: 2003 Oct
- Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites.
- Authors: Riggs BL, Melton Iii LJ 3rd, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, Peterson JM, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Bouxsein ML, Khosla S
- Issue date: 2004 Dec
- Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age.
- Authors: Wang XF, Duan Y, Beck TJ, Seeman E
- Issue date: 2005 Jun
- Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss.
- Authors: Duan Y, Turner CH, Kim BT, Seeman E
- Issue date: 2001 Dec
- Construction of the femoral neck during growth determines its strength in old age.
- Authors: Zebaze RM, Jones A, Knackstedt M, Maalouf G, Seeman E
- Issue date: 2007 Jul