Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
CitationEur. J. Heart Fail. 2006, 8(1):97-101
AbstractBACKGROUND: Supervised cardiac rehabilitation programs have been offered to patients following myocardial infarct (MI), coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for many years. However, limited information is available on the usefulness of rehabilitation programs in chronic heart failure (CHF). The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of supervised physical training on CHF patients by measuring both central and peripheral factors. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study, including 43 patients with CHF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III, mean age 68 years. After initial measurements of VO2 peak, 6 min walk distance, muscle strength, plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), echocardiogram, measurements of pulmonary function and quality of life questionnaire, patients were randomized to either a training group (n = 21) or a control group (n = 22). The training group had supervised aerobic and resistance training program twice a week for five months. After the training program was completed, all measurements were repeated in both groups. RESULTS: No training related adverse events were reported. Significant improvement was found between groups in the six minute walk test (+37.1 m vs. +5.3 m, p = 0.01), work load on the bicycle exercise test (+6.1 W vs. +2.1 W, p = 0.03), time on the bicycle exercise test (+41 s vs. +0 s, p = 0.02) and quadriceps muscle strength test (+2.8 kg. vs. +0.2 kg., p = 0.003). Quality of life factors that reflect exercise tolerance and general health, improved significantly in the training group compared to the control group. No other significant changes were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Supervised physical training as used in this study appears safe for CHF patients in NYHA class II or III. The improvement in functional capacity observed in the training group seems to be related to peripheral factors rather than in central cardiovascular performance.
DescriptionTo access Publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field
- [The effect of physical training in chronic heart failure].
- Authors: Andersen K, Jónsdóttir S, Sigurethsson AF, Sigurethsson SB
- Issue date: 2006 Nov
- Functional electrical stimulation is more effective in severe symptomatic heart failure patients and improves their adherence to rehabilitation programs.
- Authors: Karavidas A, Parissis JT, Matzaraki V, Arapi S, Varounis C, Ikonomidis I, Grillias P, Paraskevaidis I, Pirgakis V, Filippatos G, Kremastinos DT
- Issue date: 2010 Mar
- No effect of group-based aerobic interval training on N-terminal pro- B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with chronic heart failure.
- Authors: Nilsson BB, Westheim A, Risberg MA, Arnesen H, Seljeflot I
- Issue date: 2010 Aug
- Comparison of plasma N-brain natriuretic peptide, peak oxygen consumption, and left ventricular ejection fraction for severity of chronic heart failure.
- Authors: Williams SG, Ng LL, O'Brien RJ, Taylor S, Li YF, Tan LB
- Issue date: 2004 Jun 15
- Exercise training in advanced heart failure patients: discordance between improved exercise tolerance and unchanged NT-proBNP levels.
- Authors: Arad M, Adler Y, Koren-Morag N, Natanzon S, Sela BA, Ben Dov I, Shechter M, Schwammenthal E, Freimark D
- Issue date: 2008 May 7